<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MMVII LOOKBACK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/</link>
	<description>dirt, sound, lit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad78</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-4023</link>
		<dc:creator>brad78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-4023</guid>
		<description>jace,

i&#039;m glad you took time to address the the problem of djs/compilers forcing the makers of the music they build their careers on to be anonymous. its a terrible/harmful trend, and it seems to be growing as new djs/compilers reproduce what they&#039;ve seen their heroes do, think that that is how it works. meanwhile, people who, for the first time, have a chance to be heard by the rest of the world remain nameless and voiceless. it is one thing  for an dj/compiler to not name well-known artist in order to avoid the, possibly, inevitable lawsuits. however, it is another thing for a dj/compiler to obscure names and titles in order to appropriate a genre and remake it in his or her own image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jace,</p>
<p>i&#8217;m glad you took time to address the the problem of djs/compilers forcing the makers of the music they build their careers on to be anonymous. its a terrible/harmful trend, and it seems to be growing as new djs/compilers reproduce what they&#8217;ve seen their heroes do, think that that is how it works. meanwhile, people who, for the first time, have a chance to be heard by the rest of the world remain nameless and voiceless. it is one thing  for an dj/compiler to not name well-known artist in order to avoid the, possibly, inevitable lawsuits. however, it is another thing for a dj/compiler to obscure names and titles in order to appropriate a genre and remake it in his or her own image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soren_frijek</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator>soren_frijek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-4013</guid>
		<description>2007 was indeed a good year.  So here&#039;s an off-the-cuff response to Jace&#039;s &quot;2007&quot; article in Frieze, &#039;cause I found his usual prowess with the pen was rather aloof this time around:

4/4:
How much were you (physically) in London?  To say 4/4 made any serious &quot;inroads&quot; (people still use that word? WW2 slang?) is an incredible overstatement.  I can count the number of nights (that featured it) in London on one hand.  The Blogoratti may have noted (hyped) its presence, but that&#039;s about it.  It&#039;s still very much a Northern thing. And, let&#039;s face it, it&#039;s just speed garage with a little more...wobble.

Dubstep:
And to say that Dubstep&#039;s creative center (by that I assume you mean London) &quot;grew stagnant&quot;, is pretty dismissive/narrow, given some of the recent releases that have shattered any genre trappings trying to hold them back. Say what you want about the new BURIAL record, but months later, it&#039;s not boring, it&#039;s an actual ALBUM, and it gets play from people way outside any particular scene.   The recent Kode 9 podcast on Rinse, teaming up with Flying Lotus, is also a top moment for the scene, showcasing possibilities that are just &#039;plain musical&#039;, and not tempo restricted, or lost in the darkness.

Indie Rock:

I can&#039;t speak on this.

Cumbia:

Poor show.  You could insert any marginalized ethnic musical form  for the word &#039;cumbia&#039;, and you&#039;d still be saying the same old things in this paragraph.  Flip/change the names of a few places and bammo, you have every world music blog entry of 2007.  Kuduro, Baile, even Reggaeton need to move beyond this tired discourse of &quot;poor, black, indigenous&quot;. As the sound gets bigger, and pro-sumer recording technology infiltrates these places, surely the best is yet to come. And how many times can you use the words &#039;bootleg&#039; or &#039;mash-up&#039; and expect it to carry any weight?  Need examples man.  Bollocks to that bit.  I feel like I read a hundred words and all I got was a couple name-drops.  

Word Music:

NICE ONE.  I&#039;m very happy that you gave it to these Sublime Frequencies types though.  They need a swift kick in the teeth for plundering art,  without promoting actual people.

Konono No. 1:

Have you even listened to this band?  I guess you could call it &quot;neo-folk&quot;, but then it would seem that the writer is the one giving them the &quot;manicure&quot;.  They play straight up Congolese inspired African &quot;trance&quot; music with some rugged-ass modified instruments, speakers, and amplification.  And &quot;Afro-Punk?&quot;  Sheesh.  That&#039;s the best you could do?  Seriously? It&#039;s easy to hate on a group that has it&#039;s press game on lock.

Lil Wayne:

I&#039;m not so sure I&#039;d go calling out Weezy on his sex preference simply &#039;cause you want him to join your Banjee club.  I&#039;m not saying you&#039;re wrong, but why speculate? Rappers don&#039;t need to be dragged out of the closet by bloggers.

Myspace, Oink, etc:

No problems there.  Not a bad paragraph at all. Solid.

Also, you once wrote a most clever essay DISSING year-end &quot;lists&quot; did you not?  
What up with that? Stick to your guns, perhaps?

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 was indeed a good year.  So here&#8217;s an off-the-cuff response to Jace&#8217;s &#8220;2007&#8243; article in Frieze, &#8217;cause I found his usual prowess with the pen was rather aloof this time around:</p>
<p>4/4:<br />
How much were you (physically) in London?  To say 4/4 made any serious &#8220;inroads&#8221; (people still use that word? WW2 slang?) is an incredible overstatement.  I can count the number of nights (that featured it) in London on one hand.  The Blogoratti may have noted (hyped) its presence, but that&#8217;s about it.  It&#8217;s still very much a Northern thing. And, let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s just speed garage with a little more&#8230;wobble.</p>
<p>Dubstep:<br />
And to say that Dubstep&#8217;s creative center (by that I assume you mean London) &#8220;grew stagnant&#8221;, is pretty dismissive/narrow, given some of the recent releases that have shattered any genre trappings trying to hold them back. Say what you want about the new BURIAL record, but months later, it&#8217;s not boring, it&#8217;s an actual ALBUM, and it gets play from people way outside any particular scene.   The recent Kode 9 podcast on Rinse, teaming up with Flying Lotus, is also a top moment for the scene, showcasing possibilities that are just &#8216;plain musical&#8217;, and not tempo restricted, or lost in the darkness.</p>
<p>Indie Rock:</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak on this.</p>
<p>Cumbia:</p>
<p>Poor show.  You could insert any marginalized ethnic musical form  for the word &#8216;cumbia&#8217;, and you&#8217;d still be saying the same old things in this paragraph.  Flip/change the names of a few places and bammo, you have every world music blog entry of 2007.  Kuduro, Baile, even Reggaeton need to move beyond this tired discourse of &#8220;poor, black, indigenous&#8221;. As the sound gets bigger, and pro-sumer recording technology infiltrates these places, surely the best is yet to come. And how many times can you use the words &#8216;bootleg&#8217; or &#8216;mash-up&#8217; and expect it to carry any weight?  Need examples man.  Bollocks to that bit.  I feel like I read a hundred words and all I got was a couple name-drops.  </p>
<p>Word Music:</p>
<p>NICE ONE.  I&#8217;m very happy that you gave it to these Sublime Frequencies types though.  They need a swift kick in the teeth for plundering art,  without promoting actual people.</p>
<p>Konono No. 1:</p>
<p>Have you even listened to this band?  I guess you could call it &#8220;neo-folk&#8221;, but then it would seem that the writer is the one giving them the &#8220;manicure&#8221;.  They play straight up Congolese inspired African &#8220;trance&#8221; music with some rugged-ass modified instruments, speakers, and amplification.  And &#8220;Afro-Punk?&#8221;  Sheesh.  That&#8217;s the best you could do?  Seriously? It&#8217;s easy to hate on a group that has it&#8217;s press game on lock.</p>
<p>Lil Wayne:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure I&#8217;d go calling out Weezy on his sex preference simply &#8217;cause you want him to join your Banjee club.  I&#8217;m not saying you&#8217;re wrong, but why speculate? Rappers don&#8217;t need to be dragged out of the closet by bloggers.</p>
<p>Myspace, Oink, etc:</p>
<p>No problems there.  Not a bad paragraph at all. Solid.</p>
<p>Also, you once wrote a most clever essay DISSING year-end &#8220;lists&#8221; did you not?<br />
What up with that? Stick to your guns, perhaps?</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jace</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-4000</link>
		<dc:creator>jace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-4000</guid>
		<description>frieze link updated - thanks Jrim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frieze link updated &#8211; thanks Jrim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jrim</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>Fantastic article (although the first link didn&#039;t work for me... this one, however, did: http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/music_1/). These end-of-year round-ups are usually just an excuse for writers to reiterate the greatness of a very limited - and almost exclusively western, English-speaking - records. How refreshing (although, given the writer, not entirely unexpected) to get a review of the year that doesn&#039;t just bleat on about Rihanna and the new Radiohead album. Looking forward to more Clayton-penned pieces in 2008...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic article (although the first link didn&#8217;t work for me&#8230; this one, however, did: <a href="http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/music_1/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/music_1/)</a>. These end-of-year round-ups are usually just an excuse for writers to reiterate the greatness of a very limited &#8211; and almost exclusively western, English-speaking &#8211; records. How refreshing (although, given the writer, not entirely unexpected) to get a review of the year that doesn&#8217;t just bleat on about Rihanna and the new Radiohead album. Looking forward to more Clayton-penned pieces in 2008&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plus six &#187; links for 2007-12-13</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-3986</link>
		<dc:creator>plus six &#187; links for 2007-12-13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-3986</guid>
		<description>[...] mudd up! » archive » MMVII LOOKBACK DJ/Rupture&#8217;s review of the music of 2007 (tags: music dj rupture soot grime electronica world remix) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mudd up! » archive » MMVII LOOKBACK DJ/Rupture&#8217;s review of the music of 2007 (tags: music dj rupture soot grime electronica world remix) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghis</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>ghis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>Good overview !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good overview !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w&#38;w</title>
		<link>http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/comment-page-1/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator>w&#38;w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negrophonic.com/2007/mmvii-lookback/#comment-3984</guid>
		<description>nice piece in frieze! some real gems in there. 

i&#039;ve never been able to bring myself to do year-end lists, but i&#039;d give a forward to a lot of your picks, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice piece in frieze! some real gems in there. </p>
<p>i&#8217;ve never been able to bring myself to do year-end lists, but i&#8217;d give a forward to a lot of your picks, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
